View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2007, 08:14 PM
sgloer sgloer is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 702
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryingtesc
You have the problem set up nicely, however, you should multiply in rows 2, 3, and 4 instead of add. You can "split" the exponent, but you then must multiply. For example: If you had x^2+3; that would equal (x^2)(x^3), the bases are the same and in multiplication you would simply add the exponents making it x^5.
You could not put them back together if you split them like this: x^2 + x^3. They would not be "like" terms, one is squared and the other cubed.

I hope this helps with your reverse engineering because I am not familiar with that method.

Best Regards,
Jason

Yeah, that looks right. Thanks Jason--I couldn't remember exactly how the rule went.
__________________
--
Steve, Webmaster
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote